https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352073 The Court set aside the seizure and penalty orders due to the lack of opportunity for the petitioner to explain the tax value discrepancies, ruling that the principles of natural justice were violated. The matter was remitted to respondent no. 4, instructing the petitioner to treat the seizure order as a show cause notice and respond within one week. A fresh order was to be issued based on the reply within the subsequent week, with the vehicle to be released without security. The importance of allowing individuals to be heard before adverse actions based on tax evasion allegations was emphasized. en-us Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352073 The Court set aside the seizure and penalty orders due to the lack of opportunity for the petitioner to explain the tax value discrepancies, ruling that the principles of natural justice were violated. The matter was remitted to respondent no. 4, instructing the petitioner to treat the seizure order as a show cause notice and respond within one week. A fresh order was to be issued based on the reply within the subsequent week, with the vehicle to be released without security. The importance of allowing individuals to be heard before adverse actions based on tax evasion allegations was emphasized. Case-Laws GST Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352073