<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 338 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352069</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC upheld the Central Government&#039;s order for compulsory amalgamation of loss-making wholly owned subsidiary NSEL with profit-making holding company FTIL under Section 396(3) of the Companies Act in public interest. The court found no breach of natural justice principles, constitutional violations under Articles 14, 19, or 300A, or procedural irregularities. The amalgamation was deemed necessary following NSEL&#039;s collapse causing Rs. 5600 crores default to trading clients, with warehouses containing only Rs. 358 crores stock against claimed Rs. 2389.36 crores. The court applied Wednesbury reasonableness test and doctrine of proportionality, concluding the government&#039;s decision balanced stakeholder interests while protecting national economic confidence in commodity exchanges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 338 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352069</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC upheld the Central Government&#039;s order for compulsory amalgamation of loss-making wholly owned subsidiary NSEL with profit-making holding company FTIL under Section 396(3) of the Companies Act in public interest. The court found no breach of natural justice principles, constitutional violations under Articles 14, 19, or 300A, or procedural irregularities. The amalgamation was deemed necessary following NSEL&#039;s collapse causing Rs. 5600 crores default to trading clients, with warehouses containing only Rs. 358 crores stock against claimed Rs. 2389.36 crores. The court applied Wednesbury reasonableness test and doctrine of proportionality, concluding the government&#039;s decision balanced stakeholder interests while protecting national economic confidence in commodity exchanges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>