<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 33 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10868</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s findings on the genuineness of the skimmer machine transaction and the consequent depreciation claim. It remanded the issue of foreign travel expenses back to the ITAT for further examination, particularly concerning the expenses of Mrs. S.P. Hede. The appeal was partly allowed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 33 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10868</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s findings on the genuineness of the skimmer machine transaction and the consequent depreciation claim. It remanded the issue of foreign travel expenses back to the ITAT for further examination, particularly concerning the expenses of Mrs. S.P. Hede. The appeal was partly allowed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>