<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 322 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and directed the re-credit of the penalty amount of &amp;amp;8377; 4,40,000 to the Cenvat Account maintained by the appellant against the debit Entry No. 1921 dated 31.01.2003. This decision was based on the finding that the penalty amount was not utilized for the specific purposes allowed under the Cenvat Credit Rules, entitling the appellant to the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 08:00:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 322 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and directed the re-credit of the penalty amount of &amp;amp;8377; 4,40,000 to the Cenvat Account maintained by the appellant against the debit Entry No. 1921 dated 31.01.2003. This decision was based on the finding that the penalty amount was not utilized for the specific purposes allowed under the Cenvat Credit Rules, entitling the appellant to the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>