<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1826 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196552</link>
    <description>Disclosure obligations under takeover and insider trading regulations required the acquirer, independently of the company, to report changes in aggregate shareholding or voting rights at every stage. Company disclosures to stock exchanges and market-wide dissemination did not eliminate that separate obligation. Failure to make the acquirer-level disclosures constituted a technical, inadvertent infraction. Penalty must remain proportionate to the gravity of the deviation; because the information had otherwise been widely disclosed and the lapse was minor, the penalty was reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 22:06:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1826 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196552</link>
      <description>Disclosure obligations under takeover and insider trading regulations required the acquirer, independently of the company, to report changes in aggregate shareholding or voting rights at every stage. Company disclosures to stock exchanges and market-wide dissemination did not eliminate that separate obligation. Failure to make the acquirer-level disclosures constituted a technical, inadvertent infraction. Penalty must remain proportionate to the gravity of the deviation; because the information had otherwise been widely disclosed and the lapse was minor, the penalty was reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>