<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1279 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196553</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for reversal of credit of duty on molasses used in the manufacture of Rectified Spirit. It held that the appellant&#039;s method of proportionate reversal was appropriate, penalties were imposed mechanically, and discrepancies in stock did not justify confiscation or duty demand. The appellant was granted consequential benefits as per the rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 22:06:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1279 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196553</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for reversal of credit of duty on molasses used in the manufacture of Rectified Spirit. It held that the appellant&#039;s method of proportionate reversal was appropriate, penalties were imposed mechanically, and discrepancies in stock did not justify confiscation or duty demand. The appellant was granted consequential benefits as per the rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>