<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1252 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in a dispute over the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains under section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the D.V.O.&#039;s valuation unreliable and emphasized the use of market indicators like press reports and the Indian Valuer Directory. It directed the Assessing Officer to recompute capital gains based on a higher valuation, differing from the D.V.O.&#039;s assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:23:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1252 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in a dispute over the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains under section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the D.V.O.&#039;s valuation unreliable and emphasized the use of market indicators like press reports and the Indian Valuer Directory. It directed the Assessing Officer to recompute capital gains based on a higher valuation, differing from the D.V.O.&#039;s assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>