<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 686 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196549</link>
    <description>An appeal in a Central Excise matter was filed with a delay of 301 days, and the Supreme Court found that no satisfactory explanation was offered for the delay. The Civil Appeal was therefore dismissed on the ground of unexplained delay, with no substantive examination of the underlying excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:22:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 686 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196549</link>
      <description>An appeal in a Central Excise matter was filed with a delay of 301 days, and the Supreme Court found that no satisfactory explanation was offered for the delay. The Civil Appeal was therefore dismissed on the ground of unexplained delay, with no substantive examination of the underlying excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>