<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 995 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196547</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned, but the Supreme Court did not decide the classification dispute on merits. Accepting the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding that the assessee had not suppressed material facts from the Revenue, the Court held that the case was not fit for admission and refused to entertain the appeal. The operative basis for declining admission was the absence of suppression, and the classification issue remained undetermined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:15:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 995 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196547</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned, but the Supreme Court did not decide the classification dispute on merits. Accepting the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding that the assessee had not suppressed material facts from the Revenue, the Court held that the case was not fit for admission and refused to entertain the appeal. The operative basis for declining admission was the absence of suppression, and the classification issue remained undetermined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>