<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 310 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352041</link>
    <description>In block assessment proceedings, an addition for alleged unexplained cost of construction cannot be sustained solely on a valuation report where no incriminating material is found in search and the amounts already appear in the regular books of account. Chapter XIV-B is confined to undisclosed income detected as a result of search and does not replace regular assessment. Where there is no seized material showing understatement of cost, any dispute may at most be considered in regular assessment, not as block undisclosed income. The addition based only on the valuation report was therefore unsustainable, and deletion of the addition was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 08:09:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 310 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352041</link>
      <description>In block assessment proceedings, an addition for alleged unexplained cost of construction cannot be sustained solely on a valuation report where no incriminating material is found in search and the amounts already appear in the regular books of account. Chapter XIV-B is confined to undisclosed income detected as a result of search and does not replace regular assessment. Where there is no seized material showing understatement of cost, any dispute may at most be considered in regular assessment, not as block undisclosed income. The addition based only on the valuation report was therefore unsustainable, and deletion of the addition was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>