<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 291 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352022</link>
    <description>The court concluded that no anti-dumping duty should be imposed on the imported goods in question. The judgment highlighted the amendments made to the original notification, emphasizing the need to correctly identify the manufacturer, exporter, and channelizing agency. The case was remanded for further examination to establish the accurate details of these entities before making a final determination on the levy of anti-dumping duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 291 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352022</link>
      <description>The court concluded that no anti-dumping duty should be imposed on the imported goods in question. The judgment highlighted the amendments made to the original notification, emphasizing the need to correctly identify the manufacturer, exporter, and channelizing agency. The case was remanded for further examination to establish the accurate details of these entities before making a final determination on the levy of anti-dumping duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>