https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352020 Article 22(1) is satisfied if the grounds of arrest are effectively communicated as soon as may be, and simultaneous written service at the moment of arrest is not mandatory. On the facts, the arrest record showed acknowledgment of the grounds, and the next-day remand application set out the factual basis and was served on the petitioner, so the arrest under the PMLA was not illegal on this ground. Habeas corpus was also unavailable because the petitioner was already in custody under reasoned remand orders passed by a competent court after application of mind; any earlier defect was cured by the intervening valid judicial custody, and no relief could be granted. en-us Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Dec 2017 08:08:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352020 Article 22(1) is satisfied if the grounds of arrest are effectively communicated as soon as may be, and simultaneous written service at the moment of arrest is not mandatory. On the facts, the arrest record showed acknowledgment of the grounds, and the next-day remand application set out the factual basis and was served on the petitioner, so the arrest under the PMLA was not illegal on this ground. Habeas corpus was also unavailable because the petitioner was already in custody under reasoned remand orders passed by a competent court after application of mind; any earlier defect was cured by the intervening valid judicial custody, and no relief could be granted. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352020