https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352016 The High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal against the CESTAT order to approach again after the ROM decision. The appellant filed the ROM application following the High Court's order, seeking to challenge both the ROM order and the order under appeal. The High Court clarified that the ROM application was maintainable and would not prejudice the rights of either party. The Tribunal dismissed the ROM application, upholding the Commissioner's reasoning on the limitation issue and citing the settled legal position and lack of merit in the application. en-us Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Dec 2017 08:08:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352016 The High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal against the CESTAT order to approach again after the ROM decision. The appellant filed the ROM application following the High Court's order, seeking to challenge both the ROM order and the order under appeal. The High Court clarified that the ROM application was maintainable and would not prejudice the rights of either party. The Tribunal dismissed the ROM application, upholding the Commissioner's reasoning on the limitation issue and citing the settled legal position and lack of merit in the application. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352016