<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 282 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352013</link>
    <description>Deliberate misdeclaration of export consignments as bulk drugs, when the goods were in fact soap stone powder, attracted Customs penal consequences because the evidence showed a coordinated substitution scheme and active involvement in procurement, packing, transport, and filing of shipping documents; the customs penalties were upheld and the appeals were dismissed. Diversion of cleared goods contrary to the export obligation and bond conditions under the excise regime also warranted confiscation-related consequences and penalty; the denial of such relief was not sustained, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration of redemption fine and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2017 13:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 282 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352013</link>
      <description>Deliberate misdeclaration of export consignments as bulk drugs, when the goods were in fact soap stone powder, attracted Customs penal consequences because the evidence showed a coordinated substitution scheme and active involvement in procurement, packing, transport, and filing of shipping documents; the customs penalties were upheld and the appeals were dismissed. Diversion of cleared goods contrary to the export obligation and bond conditions under the excise regime also warranted confiscation-related consequences and penalty; the denial of such relief was not sustained, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration of redemption fine and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>