<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 276 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352007</link>
    <description>Soapstock arising during edible oil refining was treated as a by-product, not waste, because unintended emergence alone does not make material discardable. It is regarded as waste only where it has no value or negligible value and is intended to be thrown away. On the record, that condition was not established for the soapstock in question, so the exemption under the relevant notification was unavailable and the duty demand was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 07:58:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 276 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352007</link>
      <description>Soapstock arising during edible oil refining was treated as a by-product, not waste, because unintended emergence alone does not make material discardable. It is regarded as waste only where it has no value or negligible value and is intended to be thrown away. On the record, that condition was not established for the soapstock in question, so the exemption under the relevant notification was unavailable and the duty demand was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>