<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 265 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351996</link>
    <description>For a 100% EOU claiming DTA exemption, entitlement under Notification No. 8/97-C.E. turns on whether records and verification establish segregation of indigenous and imported inputs, not on maintaining separate machinery, godowns or manufacturing lines. A Board circular confirmed that separate factory-like arrangements are not required, so the proper test is verifiable accounting of inputs. On quantification, FIFO-based material and the IITM report could support attribution of some DTA clearances to imported raw material, but not a blanket finding that the entire clearance was so manufactured. The broad denial of exemption was unsustainable and the matter required fresh quantification and adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 265 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351996</link>
      <description>For a 100% EOU claiming DTA exemption, entitlement under Notification No. 8/97-C.E. turns on whether records and verification establish segregation of indigenous and imported inputs, not on maintaining separate machinery, godowns or manufacturing lines. A Board circular confirmed that separate factory-like arrangements are not required, so the proper test is verifiable accounting of inputs. On quantification, FIFO-based material and the IITM report could support attribution of some DTA clearances to imported raw material, but not a blanket finding that the entire clearance was so manufactured. The broad denial of exemption was unsustainable and the matter required fresh quantification and adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>