<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1392 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196541</link>
    <description>Exemption under section 10(20A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was unavailable because the claimant was not itself an authority constituted by or under an enactment in India. The entity was incorporated as a company under the Companies Act, 1956, and no notification under section 3 of the U.P. Industrial Development Act, 1962 was produced to show constitution under that law. The requirement under section 10(20A) is cumulative: the body must both be constituted by law and be established for planning, development or improvement of cities, towns or villages. Although industrial development activities may satisfy the public-purpose limb, incorporation as a company was insufficient. The exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 22:03:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1392 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196541</link>
      <description>Exemption under section 10(20A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was unavailable because the claimant was not itself an authority constituted by or under an enactment in India. The entity was incorporated as a company under the Companies Act, 1956, and no notification under section 3 of the U.P. Industrial Development Act, 1962 was produced to show constitution under that law. The requirement under section 10(20A) is cumulative: the body must both be constituted by law and be established for planning, development or improvement of cities, towns or villages. Although industrial development activities may satisfy the public-purpose limb, incorporation as a company was insufficient. The exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>