<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1505 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196546</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the rejection of the assessee&#039;s books of accounts under Section 145(3) of the IT Act was unjustified. It found that the assessee maintained proper accounts audited by a Chartered Accountant and followed the Project Completion Method consistently. The Tribunal rejected the AO&#039;s attempt to apply the Percentage Completion Method, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s right to choose its accounting method. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the AO&#039;s reliance on &#039;on-money&#039; transactions, stating it was without basis. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings, ruling in favor of the assessee on all issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 22:03:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1505 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196546</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the rejection of the assessee&#039;s books of accounts under Section 145(3) of the IT Act was unjustified. It found that the assessee maintained proper accounts audited by a Chartered Accountant and followed the Project Completion Method consistently. The Tribunal rejected the AO&#039;s attempt to apply the Percentage Completion Method, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s right to choose its accounting method. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the AO&#039;s reliance on &#039;on-money&#039; transactions, stating it was without basis. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings, ruling in favor of the assessee on all issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>