<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (9) TMI 157 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196538</link>
    <description>The suit for redemption and possession of mortgaged lands was held to be barred by limitation as the statements in the documents relied upon by the appellants did not constitute acknowledgments under Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908. The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and upholding the judgment that the suit was time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 17:47:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (9) TMI 157 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196538</link>
      <description>The suit for redemption and possession of mortgaged lands was held to be barred by limitation as the statements in the documents relied upon by the appellants did not constitute acknowledgments under Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908. The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and upholding the judgment that the suit was time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>