https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196534 The court held that the information sought from UPSC, including office notings and correspondence, should be disclosed under the RTI Act. It ruled that there is no fiduciary relationship between UPSC and the department seeking advice, and personal information exemptions do not apply when the information is requested by the concerned individual. Concerns about endangering officers' safety were acknowledged, but redaction of identifying details was deemed sufficient. The court emphasized that the necessity of notings is not a requirement for disclosure under the RTI Act and directed UPSC to provide the information with specified safeguards within four weeks, with no costs awarded. en-us Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Dec 2017 15:22:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196534 The court held that the information sought from UPSC, including office notings and correspondence, should be disclosed under the RTI Act. It ruled that there is no fiduciary relationship between UPSC and the department seeking advice, and personal information exemptions do not apply when the information is requested by the concerned individual. Concerns about endangering officers' safety were acknowledged, but redaction of identifying details was deemed sufficient. The court emphasized that the necessity of notings is not a requirement for disclosure under the RTI Act and directed UPSC to provide the information with specified safeguards within four weeks, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196534