<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (3) TMI 82 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196532</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal&#039;s award despite finding that the petitioner was denied a fair opportunity to prove its case. The Court determined that it would not be appropriate to set aside the award after the Supreme Court refused leave to appeal. Therefore, the rule nisi was discharged, and the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 14:18:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (3) TMI 82 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196532</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal&#039;s award despite finding that the petitioner was denied a fair opportunity to prove its case. The Court determined that it would not be appropriate to set aside the award after the Supreme Court refused leave to appeal. Therefore, the rule nisi was discharged, and the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>