https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196532 A tribunal's refusal to examine the conciliation officer was treated as denial of a fair opportunity to prove the existence and terms of an alleged industrial agreement, so the finding on the method of loss evaluation was vitiated. The text also notes that refusal of leave to appeal under Article 136 does not merge the award with any appellate order and does not bar Article 226 jurisdiction, but it remains a relevant discretionary factor when considering certiorari. On that basis, the earlier unsuccessful challenge before the Supreme Court weighed against interference, and writ relief was declined. en-us Wed, 12 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Dec 2017 14:18:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196532 A tribunal's refusal to examine the conciliation officer was treated as denial of a fair opportunity to prove the existence and terms of an alleged industrial agreement, so the finding on the method of loss evaluation was vitiated. The text also notes that refusal of leave to appeal under Article 136 does not merge the award with any appellate order and does not bar Article 226 jurisdiction, but it remains a relevant discretionary factor when considering certiorari. On that basis, the earlier unsuccessful challenge before the Supreme Court weighed against interference, and writ relief was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196532