https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196529 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant-bank's appeal, ruling that the suit was time-barred due to limitation. It held that the appropriation of funds from the "no lien account" was unauthorized and did not extend the limitation period. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the suit was for recovery of money, not enforcement of a mortgage, based on precedent. The appeal was rejected without costs. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Dec 2017 12:54:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196529 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant-bank's appeal, ruling that the suit was time-barred due to limitation. It held that the appropriation of funds from the "no lien account" was unauthorized and did not extend the limitation period. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the suit was for recovery of money, not enforcement of a mortgage, based on precedent. The appeal was rejected without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196529