<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 467 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196528</link>
    <description>The court held that the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) has jurisdiction over suits for the recovery of mortgage debts, as the term &quot;debt&quot; under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 includes mortgage debts. The court rejected the review application seeking to recall the order transmitting the suit to the DRT, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s competence to try claims for recovery of debts based on mortgages.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 12:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 467 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196528</link>
      <description>The court held that the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) has jurisdiction over suits for the recovery of mortgage debts, as the term &quot;debt&quot; under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 includes mortgage debts. The court rejected the review application seeking to recall the order transmitting the suit to the DRT, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s competence to try claims for recovery of debts based on mortgages.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>