<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1332 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196527</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction for a Section 17 SARFAESI challenge depends on whether the integral cause of action arises within the Tribunal&#039;s local limits. Where the challenge is directed against measures under Section 13(4), jurisdiction ordinarily lies with the Tribunal where the secured assets are situated and enforcement action is taken. Earlier steps such as demand notice, representation, consideration of representation, or communication of decision may form part of the factual background, but they do not by themselves confer jurisdiction. Mere service of notice or communication at another place, or the bank&#039;s head office being located there, is insufficient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 12:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1332 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196527</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction for a Section 17 SARFAESI challenge depends on whether the integral cause of action arises within the Tribunal&#039;s local limits. Where the challenge is directed against measures under Section 13(4), jurisdiction ordinarily lies with the Tribunal where the secured assets are situated and enforcement action is taken. Earlier steps such as demand notice, representation, consideration of representation, or communication of decision may form part of the factual background, but they do not by themselves confer jurisdiction. Mere service of notice or communication at another place, or the bank&#039;s head office being located there, is insufficient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>