<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 257 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351988</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, citing invalid initiation of penalty proceedings due to lack of specificity and non-compliance with legal standards. The decision was not based on the case&#039;s merits but on procedural irregularities in the penalty proceedings&#039; initiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 08:02:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 257 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351988</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, citing invalid initiation of penalty proceedings due to lack of specificity and non-compliance with legal standards. The decision was not based on the case&#039;s merits but on procedural irregularities in the penalty proceedings&#039; initiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>