<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 249 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351980</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal due to the non-service of the jurisdictional notice u/s. 143(2), citing legal precedent emphasizing its mandatory nature. The assessment order was canceled, and the disputed addition of Rs. 60,29,000/- was not addressed on merits as a result.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 07:56:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 249 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351980</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal due to the non-service of the jurisdictional notice u/s. 143(2), citing legal precedent emphasizing its mandatory nature. The assessment order was canceled, and the disputed addition of Rs. 60,29,000/- was not addressed on merits as a result.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>