<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 248 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351979</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for A.Ys 2005-06 to 2011-12, directing further verification by the AO on issues such as unexplained cash credits, treatment of agricultural income, and deductions under Section 80C. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y 2008-09 was allowed for statistical purposes, with the ITAT remanding the issue for verification. The ITAT emphasized the need for a fair opportunity for the assessee to present evidence in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 07:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 248 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351979</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for A.Ys 2005-06 to 2011-12, directing further verification by the AO on issues such as unexplained cash credits, treatment of agricultural income, and deductions under Section 80C. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y 2008-09 was allowed for statistical purposes, with the ITAT remanding the issue for verification. The ITAT emphasized the need for a fair opportunity for the assessee to present evidence in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>