<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 245 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351976</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of a valid and subsisting license issued by the Competent Authority in determining duty liability. The judgment highlighted the distinction between licenses obtained through fraud and those issued by the appropriate authority, ultimately leading to the dismissal of duty demands and penalties against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 07:56:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 245 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351976</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of a valid and subsisting license issued by the Competent Authority in determining duty liability. The judgment highlighted the distinction between licenses obtained through fraud and those issued by the appropriate authority, ultimately leading to the dismissal of duty demands and penalties against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>