<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 231 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351962</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, directing a re-quantification of duty and providing the appellants with a fair opportunity to present their case. The Original Authority&#039;s decision on valuation of goods sold through depot and differential Central Excise duty calculation was set aside due to discrepancies and lack of sustainable reasoning. The matter was remanded for detailed examination in accordance with Rule 11, emphasizing the need for a thorough quantification of duty without imposing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 07:54:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 231 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351962</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, directing a re-quantification of duty and providing the appellants with a fair opportunity to present their case. The Original Authority&#039;s decision on valuation of goods sold through depot and differential Central Excise duty calculation was set aside due to discrepancies and lack of sustainable reasoning. The matter was remanded for detailed examination in accordance with Rule 11, emphasizing the need for a thorough quantification of duty without imposing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>