<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 229 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case concerning denial of SSI exemption and seizure of cash allegedly from clandestine goods. The decision highlighted procedural lapses, lack of cross-examination opportunities, and discrepancies in evidence. Emphasizing the need for a fair chance for the assessee to present their case effectively, the Tribunal directed a fresh examination by the original authority, stressing the importance of proper procedural adherence and thorough evaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 07:54:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 229 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case concerning denial of SSI exemption and seizure of cash allegedly from clandestine goods. The decision highlighted procedural lapses, lack of cross-examination opportunities, and discrepancies in evidence. Emphasizing the need for a fair chance for the assessee to present their case effectively, the Tribunal directed a fresh examination by the original authority, stressing the importance of proper procedural adherence and thorough evaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>