https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351955 The Tribunal set aside the order-in-original dated 28.02.2017, allowing all appeals filed by the assessee-Appellants on 04.12.2017. The Department failed to provide sufficient corroborative evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal against the appellants. Retracted statements and procedural irregularities, including the lack of proper investigation and failure to involve key individuals, weakened the Department's case. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence in serious charges like clandestine removal, ultimately leading to the favorable outcome for the appellants. en-us Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351955 The Tribunal set aside the order-in-original dated 28.02.2017, allowing all appeals filed by the assessee-Appellants on 04.12.2017. The Department failed to provide sufficient corroborative evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal against the appellants. Retracted statements and procedural irregularities, including the lack of proper investigation and failure to involve key individuals, weakened the Department's case. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence in serious charges like clandestine removal, ultimately leading to the favorable outcome for the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351955