https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351951 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, a PVC products manufacturer, contesting duty demands and penalties for excess finished goods. The Tribunal found that the non-updated RG-I Register and lack of evidence of intent to evade duty rendered confiscation unjustified. Emphasizing that goods remaining in the factory do not warrant confiscation, the Tribunal overturned the impugned order imposing fines and confiscating goods. The decision was made on 24/11/2017 by Member (Judicial) S.K. Mohanty. en-us Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Dec 2017 07:53:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351951 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, a PVC products manufacturer, contesting duty demands and penalties for excess finished goods. The Tribunal found that the non-updated RG-I Register and lack of evidence of intent to evade duty rendered confiscation unjustified. Emphasizing that goods remaining in the factory do not warrant confiscation, the Tribunal overturned the impugned order imposing fines and confiscating goods. The decision was made on 24/11/2017 by Member (Judicial) S.K. Mohanty. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351951