https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351947 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against allegations of clandestine removal of excisable goods without payment of Central Excise duty. The discrepancy between progress report figures and the RG-1 Register was resolved, with the appellant demonstrating accurate record-keeping. The Tribunal found no evidence of clandestine removal, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal with any necessary relief. en-us Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Dec 2017 07:53:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351947 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against allegations of clandestine removal of excisable goods without payment of Central Excise duty. The discrepancy between progress report figures and the RG-1 Register was resolved, with the appellant demonstrating accurate record-keeping. The Tribunal found no evidence of clandestine removal, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal with any necessary relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351947