<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 211 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, ruling that the value of bought out bottle caps should be included in the assessable value of plastic containers for excise duty payment. The Tribunal considered the cap as an essential component for the functionality of the product, drawing parallels with a similar case. The decision was rendered on 26.10.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 07:53:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 211 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, ruling that the value of bought out bottle caps should be included in the assessable value of plastic containers for excise duty payment. The Tribunal considered the cap as an essential component for the functionality of the product, drawing parallels with a similar case. The decision was rendered on 26.10.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>