https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351938 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the absence of a counter signature by the Ministry did not justify the imposition of penalty or extended demand period. The decision was based on the lack of evidence of fraud or suppression, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. en-us Fri, 20 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Dec 2017 07:53:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351938 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the absence of a counter signature by the Ministry did not justify the imposition of penalty or extended demand period. The decision was based on the lack of evidence of fraud or suppression, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351938