https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10843 The court affirmed jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court as part of the cause of action arose in Mumbai. The doctrine of "forum convenience" was not applicable due to insufficient grounds. The leave under clause 12 was validly granted before the suit was officially received, rendering the post-facto argument invalid. The chamber summons was dismissed with costs, and the order granting leave under clause 12 was upheld. en-us Fri, 05 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10843 The court affirmed jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court as part of the cause of action arose in Mumbai. The doctrine of "forum convenience" was not applicable due to insufficient grounds. The leave under clause 12 was validly granted before the suit was officially received, rendering the post-facto argument invalid. The chamber summons was dismissed with costs, and the order granting leave under clause 12 was upheld. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 05 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10843