https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196517 Section 9 interim protection is assessed on the ordinary injunction tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury, and the restraint on dealing with the shares was maintained because the MoU contemplated preservation of the status quo until listing and the arbitration subject matter would otherwise be frustrated. The suppression objection failed because the allegedly omitted documents were already within the appellants' knowledge and no material concealment to secure an unfair ex parte advantage was shown. Clause 28 of the MoU was construed to cover disputes among all signatories, including minority shareholders inter se, so the arbitration objection failed and the appointment request was granted. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:31:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196517 Section 9 interim protection is assessed on the ordinary injunction tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury, and the restraint on dealing with the shares was maintained because the MoU contemplated preservation of the status quo until listing and the arbitration subject matter would otherwise be frustrated. The suppression objection failed because the allegedly omitted documents were already within the appellants' knowledge and no material concealment to secure an unfair ex parte advantage was shown. Clause 28 of the MoU was construed to cover disputes among all signatories, including minority shareholders inter se, so the arbitration objection failed and the appointment request was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196517