<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 1024 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196515</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, granting interim protection to the appellant until the High Court decided the writ petition. The Court found that the Corporation and Government&#039;s undue haste in allotting land to respondent No. 4 violated Article 14 of the Constitution, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the status quo to prevent irreparable harm. The appeal was disposed of without costs, with instructions for the High Court to expedite the hearing process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 1024 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196515</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, granting interim protection to the appellant until the High Court decided the writ petition. The Court found that the Corporation and Government&#039;s undue haste in allotting land to respondent No. 4 violated Article 14 of the Constitution, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the status quo to prevent irreparable harm. The appeal was disposed of without costs, with instructions for the High Court to expedite the hearing process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>