https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196515 Interim protection was considered under the settled tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury in a writ challenge to land allotment. The Court noted material suggesting rejection of the appellant's application without reasons, unusual haste in the rival allotment, and a statutory framework requiring fair, reasoned and non-arbitrary action. It also treated the limited development of the land as relevant because refusal of protection could make the writ petition ineffective. Delay in approaching the Court was not decisive where arbitrariness and possible equality concerns were plausibly shown, and status quo was continued pending final disposal. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Oct 2023 16:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196515 Interim protection was considered under the settled tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury in a writ challenge to land allotment. The Court noted material suggesting rejection of the appellant's application without reasons, unusual haste in the rival allotment, and a statutory framework requiring fair, reasoned and non-arbitrary action. It also treated the limited development of the land as relevant because refusal of protection could make the writ petition ineffective. Delay in approaching the Court was not decisive where arbitrariness and possible equality concerns were plausibly shown, and status quo was continued pending final disposal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196515