<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 689 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196514</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta addressed an appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act against an injunction order by the Company Law Board lacking reasons. The Court found the appeal maintainable due to the absence of reasons in the injunction order. Consequently, the injunction was set aside, and the Board was directed to proceed without adjournments. Parties were to maintain the status quo, with modified timelines for exchanging affidavits. The appellant could conduct Board Meetings without appointing a new Director until the application&#039;s resolution. Each party bore its costs, and the importance of providing reasons for legal decisions, especially for injunctions, was emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 10:58:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 689 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196514</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta addressed an appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act against an injunction order by the Company Law Board lacking reasons. The Court found the appeal maintainable due to the absence of reasons in the injunction order. Consequently, the injunction was set aside, and the Board was directed to proceed without adjournments. Parties were to maintain the status quo, with modified timelines for exchanging affidavits. The appellant could conduct Board Meetings without appointing a new Director until the application&#039;s resolution. Each party bore its costs, and the importance of providing reasons for legal decisions, especially for injunctions, was emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>