https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351933 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding that the notice issued under the CGST/SGST Act for misclassification and undervaluation of goods was not justified. It was determined that CGST and SGST were not applicable to inter-State transportation of goods, and the detaining authority lacked proper verification before demanding payment. The court ordered the release of the goods and directed cooperation between the parties for adjudication proceedings under the IGST Act, with each party bearing their own costs. en-us Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Apr 2018 15:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351933 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding that the notice issued under the CGST/SGST Act for misclassification and undervaluation of goods was not justified. It was determined that CGST and SGST were not applicable to inter-State transportation of goods, and the detaining authority lacked proper verification before demanding payment. The court ordered the release of the goods and directed cooperation between the parties for adjudication proceedings under the IGST Act, with each party bearing their own costs. Case-Laws GST Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351933