<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 200 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351931</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee primarily on the ground that the penalty notice under Section 274 was invalid due to non-specification of the nature of the penalty. The penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income was quashed. Other issues raised were not addressed, and the order dated 30th November 2017 set aside the penalty confirmed by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:15:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 200 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351931</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee primarily on the ground that the penalty notice under Section 274 was invalid due to non-specification of the nature of the penalty. The penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income was quashed. Other issues raised were not addressed, and the order dated 30th November 2017 set aside the penalty confirmed by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>