<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 199 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351930</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various issues, remanding certain matters back to the AO for fresh examination and providing the assessee an opportunity to present additional evidence. The appeals of the Revenue for assessment year 2007-08 were dismissed, while those for assessment year 2009-10 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The appeals of the assessee for both assessment years were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:15:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 199 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351930</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various issues, remanding certain matters back to the AO for fresh examination and providing the assessee an opportunity to present additional evidence. The appeals of the Revenue for assessment year 2007-08 were dismissed, while those for assessment year 2009-10 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The appeals of the assessee for both assessment years were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>