<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 83 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10836</link>
    <description>A special audit direction under the Income-tax Act is valid where the Assessing Officer forms bona fide satisfaction on material showing complexity of accounts; the term &quot;complex&quot; is to be read broadly, and numerous transactions, discrepancies, erasures or overwritings may justify the audit. Once the special audit direction is valid, the period spent in audit is excluded while computing limitation for assessment under the relevant limitation provision. On that basis, the assessment is treated as within time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 83 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10836</link>
      <description>A special audit direction under the Income-tax Act is valid where the Assessing Officer forms bona fide satisfaction on material showing complexity of accounts; the term &quot;complex&quot; is to be read broadly, and numerous transactions, discrepancies, erasures or overwritings may justify the audit. Once the special audit direction is valid, the period spent in audit is excluded while computing limitation for assessment under the relevant limitation provision. On that basis, the assessment is treated as within time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>