<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 192 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both AY 2012-13 and AY 2013-14, holding that the interest income earned on fixed deposits during the pre-operative period should be treated as capital receipts and allowed to be set off against pre-commencement expenses. The decision was based on the principle that funds inextricably linked to the project setup should be capitalized, as established in various judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:14:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 192 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both AY 2012-13 and AY 2013-14, holding that the interest income earned on fixed deposits during the pre-operative period should be treated as capital receipts and allowed to be set off against pre-commencement expenses. The decision was based on the principle that funds inextricably linked to the project setup should be capitalized, as established in various judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>