<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 173 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351904</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 05.09.2013. The appellant was acquitted of the charge under Section 22 of the NDPS Act and ordered to be released forthwith if not involved in any other case. The court emphasized the multiple procedural lapses and non-compliance with mandatory provisions, which rendered the prosecution&#039;s case highly doubtful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:13:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 173 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351904</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 05.09.2013. The appellant was acquitted of the charge under Section 22 of the NDPS Act and ordered to be released forthwith if not involved in any other case. The court emphasized the multiple procedural lapses and non-compliance with mandatory provisions, which rendered the prosecution&#039;s case highly doubtful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>