<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 167 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351898</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for re-quantification of the demand, emphasizing the need for a clear differentiation between activities subject to service tax and those constituting statutory levies. The judgment highlighted the importance of correctly applying the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, in determining the taxability of services provided by government entities like municipal corporations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 167 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351898</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for re-quantification of the demand, emphasizing the need for a clear differentiation between activities subject to service tax and those constituting statutory levies. The judgment highlighted the importance of correctly applying the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, in determining the taxability of services provided by government entities like municipal corporations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>