<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 163 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351894</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the 50% advertisement expenses borne by dealers/distributors should not be included in the assessable value of the appellant&#039;s goods under the Central Excise Act. The expenses were deemed not to constitute additional consideration flowing to the appellants. Relying on various precedents, the Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellants and allowing the appeals. The judgment was delivered on 30/11/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 163 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351894</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the 50% advertisement expenses borne by dealers/distributors should not be included in the assessable value of the appellant&#039;s goods under the Central Excise Act. The expenses were deemed not to constitute additional consideration flowing to the appellants. Relying on various precedents, the Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellants and allowing the appeals. The judgment was delivered on 30/11/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>