<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 161 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351892</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the cenvat credit was available to the Appellant for bills of entry post 28.01.2004. The judgment in cases of Essar Steel and Deepak Spinners was distinguished, and demands prior to 28.01.2004 were deemed time-barred due to a bonafide belief. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was granted with consequential reliefs. The decision was rendered on 30/11/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 161 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351892</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the cenvat credit was available to the Appellant for bills of entry post 28.01.2004. The judgment in cases of Essar Steel and Deepak Spinners was distinguished, and demands prior to 28.01.2004 were deemed time-barred due to a bonafide belief. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was granted with consequential reliefs. The decision was rendered on 30/11/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>