https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351885 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming confiscation of goods, imposition of redemption fine, and penalties on the appellants, allowing the appeals in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized that Rule 25 cannot be invoked without intent to evade duty payment, citing the importance of Section 11AC in determining penalties under the rule. Despite acknowledging no intent to defraud, the Tribunal held that non-payment within the timeframe attracts penal consequences under Rule 27. en-us Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:12:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351885 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming confiscation of goods, imposition of redemption fine, and penalties on the appellants, allowing the appeals in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized that Rule 25 cannot be invoked without intent to evade duty payment, citing the importance of Section 11AC in determining penalties under the rule. Despite acknowledging no intent to defraud, the Tribunal held that non-payment within the timeframe attracts penal consequences under Rule 27. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351885