<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 152 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351883</link>
    <description>Invalid service of an appellate order on a person who was not the authorised representative cannot start limitation against the assessee; limitation runs from actual receipt by the proper representative, and a short delay may be condoned on that basis. Under the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, abatement of duty depends on a continuous closure of the factory for 15 days or more, and the period is assessed as one uninterrupted span rather than broken by calendar months. A factory closure continuing for 85 days therefore supported abatement for the disputed April period, and the disallowance of duty adjustment was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 152 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351883</link>
      <description>Invalid service of an appellate order on a person who was not the authorised representative cannot start limitation against the assessee; limitation runs from actual receipt by the proper representative, and a short delay may be condoned on that basis. Under the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, abatement of duty depends on a continuous closure of the factory for 15 days or more, and the period is assessed as one uninterrupted span rather than broken by calendar months. A factory closure continuing for 85 days therefore supported abatement for the disputed April period, and the disallowance of duty adjustment was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>