https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351883 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing abatement for the period 01/04/2010 to 08/04/2010 due to the factory's 85-day closure. The appeal was granted as the delay in filing the appeal was condoned, starting from the date the appellant received the order. The initial decision disallowing abatement was overturned, providing the appellant with consequential benefits. en-us Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351883 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing abatement for the period 01/04/2010 to 08/04/2010 due to the factory's 85-day closure. The appeal was granted as the delay in filing the appeal was condoned, starting from the date the appellant received the order. The initial decision disallowing abatement was overturned, providing the appellant with consequential benefits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351883